Comments : Which one?

  • 3 years ago

    by Everlasting

    Hmm I tried once to be nonsensical and this piece was the result of it “De(Me)ntal”. So, I arrived to the conclusion that whenever I try to be nonsensical, sense somehow resurfaces. And whenever I try to be as sensical as possible, everything people hear is nonsense. Or like, whenever I try to be creative, I just aren’t. But whenever I don’t try, I am. It may sound like I’m pretentious. But no, it’s actually kind of sad. Also, the other day, husband was showing a video about synchronized pendulums. Actually, the pendulums started in different directions but eventually synced to the same rhythm. Or how bridges fall when people walk at the same rhythm. Anyways, I will ponder about your question. Thanks for sharing.

    • 3 years ago

      by ddavidd

      You have matured so much in understanding contrasts. I think you and Larry are the only people who are able to understand dialectic (Hegel) And that is not because you two are smarter than others , but because "IT" is not available to the most of people, some even smarter than us.
      In this verse it is about seeing, and about patterns. If you rely on senses you would never see them( the patterns.) One only through a clear mind, and being careless is able to see the nonsensical patterns.
      Also by Nonsensical, I do not mean gibberish. I mean a state of heightened awareness.
      Thanks for reading, and being like me, a true student.