ReBecca
15 years ago
So...... we get some folks who initiate some contests, and they never come back to to do the actual judging. What is up with that? I understand that there might not be alot of folks who did join, but dont you owe it to the ones who did, to at least honor the rules and criteria to start with? I think it is messed up to start a competition that you have no intentions to see through. We all have life happening in between P & Q, but if you start something you should finish it and if you cant than you should not have started it to begin with (which is going to win me no awards). I am just speaking my mind here. I have entered several topics, to try to enrich myself (and for accolades, no lie) but of those, there is never any follow up or actuall judging. Why? |
ReBecca
15 years ago
The comments part dont really matter to me. I was just hoping to be judged in a competion with other poets and see where I stand (so to speak) on a level with others. It is very disappointing to put yourself out there and not even get the dignity of being acknowledged in a competion that was started for whatever reason. I have participated in several "competions" that have never been judged once the initial poster started it. I find that to be a lack of character in the person who originally started the thread. In my opinion, if you have no intentions in following through with something then you should not initiate it. As I said before, we all have lives outside of P&Q, but if you commit to something, whether it be here or elsewhere, you should follow through. I am glad that I am not the only one who feels this way MisTake. I feel that there should be rules or guidelines to those who start a thread initiating a contest. And if it is abused or not followed up on then perhaps that person should not be allowed to start another. Of course, as I said before, the mods have alot of other stuff to deal with and it would probably be hard for them to monitor something such as this. But it is nice to know that I am not alone in my thoughts on this. |
Italian Stallion
15 years ago
I agree with this, it is highly annoying plus takes up unnessesary space. In the past I actually did do a little monitoring on this particular subject, I actually went and judged and commented what was offered by the original poster of the thread which was left to rot basically, but do to the high amount of contest being dropped, I just don't have the time like I used to, like you stated in your post, we have lifes and much to do aside from the site. I for one am working a fulltime job as well as going to 2 colleges fulltime, and also in the process of getting another fulltime job. So naturally you can see I personally have been a bit busy aside from the site, but all in all, even though it isn't fair I would recommend for someone in that particular contest to step up to the plate and take it upon themself or a group of people to read, judge and comment. |
The Queen
15 years ago
Well I guess what goes around comes around. |
Cyber Saiyan
15 years ago
I agree with everything posted. |
Teria
15 years ago
I understand where Cyber Saiyan is coming from with the comment part, but I'd have to agree with Bob on that. I'm guilty of holding competitions in the past and not getting all the comments out or withholding the contest so long for enterants that I just gave up on it. I try not to do that now. I've decided after my most recent elongated contest that if the poems aren't in by the due date then that's not my fault. I'll send reminders a few days before but that's that. I'm also going to watch who enters my contests, if they start to fall back and not enter time after time then I'll quit allowing them to enter. I know that's a bit much but why should they waste up space on the contest where other people could easily enter and have a chance to win. |
Jenni Marie
15 years ago
STOP sending me private |
The Queen
15 years ago
It's easier said than done. |
Italian Stallion
15 years ago
Contest rules have now been posted: I will also post them in this thread for double exposure: |