Baby Rainbow
10 years ago
I think the inactive clubs should be deleted if no activity after one month. Even when my previous clubs have been inactive, there have still been posts weekly! |
CuteThingsGoneWrong
10 years ago
One to 3. Three being the longest. |
Courageous Dreamer
10 years ago
Agreed on the one month |
Meena Krish
10 years ago
5 hours is just a bit too much. We have to take in consideration of the time difference. |
silvershoes
10 years ago
Wow, guys! We thought 18 months would be a big step, but 1 month is huuuuge. I think we should start with 6 months. That'll actually get rid of a fair amount of clubs. Afterward, re-discuss? |
Larry Chamberlin
10 years ago
Our "Modest Proposal" seems to have resonated. |
gumshuda
10 years ago, updated 6 years ago
3 months |
Larry Chamberlin
10 years ago
That's twice in one week I've scarfed Narph! |
Colm
10 years ago
I say 3 months. With pm reminders to club managers and assistants in the weeks leading up to the the 3 month inactivity date. |
Larry Chamberlin
10 years ago
A warning seems important |
Poet on the Piano
10 years ago
Ah just coming home from class and was thinking, well most of the members will probably be removed from the club. One sure way to spike activity lol... although I did like the idea of posting a poem every five hours, how's that for speed writing? |
Britt
10 years ago
MA, not everyone writes as much as you do. Give us a break! :P |
Poet on the Piano
10 years ago
Hey, it's been what, 1 day since a new poem? And then 7 days before that? I've been slacking obviously. |
Michael D Nalley
10 years ago
It should not have taken me so long... The main forum has had days it was not that active lol |
Larry Chamberlin
10 years ago
If the main forum goes five hours, we suspend Janis |
CuteThingsGoneWrong
10 years ago
I still lean towards 3 as the favored. 6 Is overkill... half year abs no.posts... dead at 3. It's easy ( I'm homeless ) and I log in daily.... posting once every three months? Easy at most 4 months. Hell 3 months then a warning that if no one posts in the next month it will be deleted.... then at month 4 bam. |
silvershoes
10 years ago
One month would be insane. I was traveling abroad for 6 months at one point and barely checked in. If someone has a baby, they're likely not going to check in. Planning a wedding? Gravely ill? New job and moving? A month flies by, it really does. 3 months would be fine. We're dropping this down from 2 years. No need to be drastic. Some clubs only have a handful of members and some people have busy lives. |
Melpomene
10 years ago
Glad to see some of our members caught us out on the joke, can't fool you all hey. |
Narph
10 years ago
Have we abolished the idea of not allowing new clubs? I think that's particularly problematic, cause it caters only to those of us who are already known to eachother, and already in a club. Any group of new people to this site should have the ability to form their own club, if they want. They shouldn't have to push and pull to fit into someone else's group. |
silvershoes
10 years ago
Haha yeah. That part was 100% a joke. Bring on the new clubs! |
abracadabra
10 years ago
6 months. PM after 3 months. |
Britt
10 years ago
The newbies had no part, poor things were asleep. Well, I did, but I'm only half newbie. |
Sylvia
10 years ago
^^^ brought in on the prank with us, so don't take Nicko, Abby, or Sylvia too seriously here. |
CuteThingsGoneWrong
10 years ago
Lol. I was shocked at first then it dawned.. Like right after the first post xD ANd then i just kinda went with it because i wanted to see if it was a joke or not xD Haha... |
silvershoes
10 years ago
I reread your post just now, Sylvia, and you're right. Your posts were serious and a realistic response to the proposition. Your second post mentioned 1 month or 6 months. I, myself, am for some kind of gradient. 6 months and in 3 months, pm's sent out to all remaining clubs that we will be taking the next step: 3 months. I would argue that any time less than 3 months would be unnecessarily harsh. |
silvershoes
10 years ago
Nei, we were surprised by how many people caught on. I expected members to freak out - thought it might actually break in the new modlets and get them prepared. Heh. People will want your head when you're a mod. Obviously not everyone and definitely not all the time, but trust me, you can't make the whole site happy (though it is inevitably our ultimate goal). |
CuteThingsGoneWrong
10 years ago
Lmao. I wasnt to worried either way. I figured even if you guys did think that was the course of action a mass pm would be sent out and most of you guys (if not all.. I dont know most of the mods, not close to most of you guys) are pretty level headed from what ive lurked on here. Yall would listen to debate and im sure enough people would push as the talk became more serious. |
abracadabra
10 years ago
Really, an inactive club is nobody else's business and doesn't affect anything. Club members can leave anytime. The main incentive to delete clubs is so that club-seekers don't have trawl through a long list of death before finding a good club. Unless new clubs are springing up every week, I don't see why we have to be strict on the time frame. 6 months, not 3. |
Baby Rainbow
10 years ago
What was that Guinae Pig??? You want me to hold a marathon where you have to write as many poems as you can in only 5 hours?? |
Larry Chamberlin
10 years ago
ACTUALLY, BR, I do have a contest challenge |
Nicko
10 years ago
I agree 6 months as a minimum, its no big deal if they just sit there inactive for that period or even longer... it actually shows a bit of the sites history.... |
silvershoes
10 years ago
"Yall would listen to debate and im sure enough people would push as the talk became more serious. |
silvershoes
10 years ago
We sure got a kick out of it. If nothing else, we stimulated a discussion worth discussing and got members posting. I'm content. |
CuteThingsGoneWrong
10 years ago
That makes perfect sense! |
Meena Krish
10 years ago
This is way too much reading after this type of discussion even the muse will run away! |