Bob Shank
8 years ago
First let me begin by telling a story. Last year my Nephew played little league and was awarded the most valuable player award, they gave him the award because he tried hard, and gave it his all, personally I was livid, because he had 2 hits all year, batted way under the Mendoza line for those who know baseball , yet there was a girl on his team that practiced every day on and off the field , who batted over .700 (which is unheard of) and was by far the best player in the entire league. So her efforts weren't rewarded at all. I don't believe in giving trophies to those that don't earn them, it lowers the standards, and the desire to better oneself.........What does this have to do with anything, we'll get to that later. |
Daisy if you do
8 years ago
Wow, I am truly shocked. I never had a clue you were a judge. Now let me say as well, when the biased judging thing was brought to main boards, I was offended and thought it was being directed at my choices, yes I was a judge as well. I still feel like it was being directed towards some of my choices, as I did vote for some quite often. Ben being one of them, Andrea another. I carefully considered every single poem every single week. To be honest, before my judging term, Ben won one week with three poems and I thought to myself there had to be something else worthy of winning other than 3 of Ben's poems. I don't know because I wasn't a judge then and didn't read all the nominated poems that week.But in all honesty the first couple of weeks as a judge I overlooked Ben's poetry simply because I thought he won too much. That wasn't fair and it was very biased of me to do so. He honestly has some fantastic poems and he truly deserved my nominations and points a couple of times when I overlooked him. I quickly got over that and fell in love with his poetry, and found myself voting for his quite consistently. He writes a lot so he would have many nominations each week. I know exactly the week Bob is referring to as not as many quality poems then boom we were overloaded with awesome poems making it hard to narrow down. There are a lot of talented writers on this site and being biased is simply natural. We connect with some people's poetry more than others at times. My decisions this week have already been made and I don't regret a single one. I narrowed it down based on how the poems made me feel this week with all poetic value thrown to the side. I found myself also voting for a lot of PR's poems, as was questioned, not because it was PR or anything but because those were the poems I connected with. I have also voted in the past for poems from people I had "run-ins" with, because personal feelings aside I liked their poetry. I enjoyed this judging term, but now to focus on commenting more and nominating for the next round of judges will be my priority. If anyone has questions on my picks please feel free to ask, I will add all my comments to poems throughout the term this upcoming week. |
Larry Chamberlin
8 years ago
Full disclosure: I am the mod who "blasted" Bob for declining to pick a third poem. Actually I thought I merely suggested the idea, did not realize it was taken so harshly, so I apologize, Bob. I may also have mis-spoken when I said none of us are poet laureates as it seems Ben has the makings for it. |
Daisy if you do
8 years ago
I apologize for hijacking this thread with all my past comments as a judge, Save for this week. I wanted all of them in one spot so I can transfer more easily to each poem. Just overlook them or read them all. Entirely up to you. I also added them here so one could see the amount of times I voted for whom. If someone wants to do the math, go ahead. I did a little and it shows I voted for Andrea the most 7 times (one was a collaboration with Mr. Darcy) then Ben 5 times, then Poet on the piano 4 times, who is actually a member of my club. I don't believe it was bias, these 3 people generated more poems Consistently being nominated. There are 18 different people that I voted at least one time for in my term. Of those 16, 10 of those were writers I haven't heard of before and don't see on the main boards. 2 of those writers I have voted for got more than one vote from me in separate weeks. I was constantly looking for new people. Anyway, I think it's a crock when one has to defend and justify their voting, that is the beauty of being a judge. |
Larry Chamberlin
8 years ago
Kay, if it were put to a vote, I think 99 of 100 would say you have NO need to justify any votes. Put these comments on the poems for which they were written and sleep easy - without regrets. ;8-) |
Ben Pickard
8 years ago
A sincere thank you to all the judges as per every week (whether they pick me or not) simply for the time invested in what really cannot be an easy job sometimes. |
Maple Tree
8 years ago
I was a judge as well.... It's all about the poetry for me.... |
Daisy if you do
8 years ago
I stand corrected Ben, my apologies, I do believe it was three weeks in a row maybe, I don't remember correctly. I am sorry I didn't give you a fair shake to begin with because I felt like you won all the time. Now, I know why you consistently won. Your poetry is amazing. |
Narph
8 years ago
Re: Bob's first post here: |
Larry Chamberlin
8 years ago
FYI: Anna Stephens won with two poems on the same week at the end of October |
silvershoes
8 years ago
Bob, you can think something is not a poem, but that doesn't make it fact. Poetry is subjective. Taste varies. We're all biased. As a judge, you get to decide what you think is poetry and what you think isn't -- you did that. You didn't vote on poems you felt were "journal entries," and that's fine. You don't get to decide for other judges what is and isn't poetry to them. Honestly, the more you all disagree, the less biased the picks are each week. That's the ultimate goal. |
Hellon
8 years ago
I have tried, for the most part, to ignore these cheap little shots aimed at me regarding bias judging that have been cropping up over the last week or so and have rolled with the punches, although I would like to point out that the original comment was not made by me nor was the thread. I decided to find out if there was any truth in the claim and, as a result have become the fall guy for some of you to leave snide remarks here and there. Once again, if you have a problem with me direct the problem to me not at me. |
Bob Shank
8 years ago
I said it was my opinion that there are writings being nominated that I didn't view as poetry, my opinion and suffice to say, I never said or made the impression that anyone else had to agree with that opinion, however I didn't vote for anything that I didn't feel in "my opinion" wasn't poetry, and you're absolutely right, it's subjective.....unto the reader and Narph , many times I do voice constructive criticism on some poems and have been known to question formatting , essays vs. poem etc..... |
Larry Chamberlin
8 years ago
Bob selected a poem for the 4 but chose not to comment. |
Hellon
8 years ago
You can wrap it up in any fancy wording you like Larry but...as I said, the information Jane provided had too many grey areas for me to be convinced that there was nothing untoward going on. |
Larry Chamberlin
8 years ago
You cannot cover the sun with one finger. |
Hellon
8 years ago
You know..in situations like these, where questions need answers, I always come out batting for the underdog...they are the members who I feel could have been overlooked in favour of well...more popular/clique types and...from the pm's I've received backing this I've carried on with it but now...I'm drained...I've had enough..stop sitting on the fence you guys..time to fight your own battles..I'm done for now... |
Ben Pickard
8 years ago
Hellon |
Ben Pickard
8 years ago
To make clear, finally, on a post addressed to everyone, I only come on here to read and write poetry, I do not want animosity with anyone and I want to leave this here now. |
hiraeth
8 years ago
Hellon, |
Larry Chamberlin
8 years ago
Bias: "prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair" |
Bob Shank
8 years ago
Https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwixg6Hm6JvLAhUEZCYKHcgOAboQFggiMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheodysseyonline.com%2Func-asheville%2Fcommentary-objective-study%2F158034&usg=AFQjCNGLv5SnZzZZNhgNqGdLpaVr6zsk8w |
Hellon
8 years ago
Hellon, I submit that both Bob and Kay chose the wrong word in stating their judging styles, which played into your purposeful twist of their meaning to foment distrust |
Larry Chamberlin
8 years ago
Hellon, perhaps you're right. Let's ask: |
Bob Shank
8 years ago
1. I tried to be as fair and as impartial as I possibly could, which is why i just clicked on poems nominated before reading the Authors name or who nominated them, and never once did I click on an Authors profile. |
Hellon
8 years ago
1. I tried to be as fair and as impartial as I possibly could, which is why i just clicked on poems nominated before reading the Authors name or who nominated them, and never once did I click on an Authors profile. |
Larry Chamberlin
8 years ago
That's one for the Janis wish list |
Karla
8 years ago
I was a judge some time ago and i was impartial.i have never been biased in my life. it is awful to privilege friends in detriment of a new poet or even those we look down on for no real reason. poetry is so precious and i do think we can't judge what is poetry or not because it doesn't lend itself to any definition. here lies its beauty and power. above all poetry is one of the best things we can offer in a world deprived of light, love and critical consciousness. so let the magic begins over and over again. |
Everlasting
8 years ago
Just sharing some thoughts : |
abracadabra
8 years ago
Serious question: would you rather have your poetry judged by a poetry robot or a panel of humans? |
abracadabra
8 years ago
I'm not sure either. Surely some poems will always be seen as unequivocally shite, yet a promising poem might be disregarded by a human judge because they didn't get a coffee that morning? Or got too many hugs growing up? Or suddenly got bored with life? Robots don't need coffee or hugs, generally, and are very task oriented. |
Larry Chamberlin
8 years ago
How do you program a computer to assess for intuition, or emotional response? |
Everlasting
8 years ago
^Or the number of hairs each person has on their head. |
Larry Chamberlin
8 years ago
^ Hmm, Luce, explains why I lose every tie breaker |
Ben Pickard
8 years ago
Laughing out loud now, Larry! |
Britt
8 years ago
Years ago I actually watched the tie breaking closely, and it did go based off of nominations/votes/visits from what I could tell. Every Monday morning before the site updated the front page, I'd write down the poems, the number of nominations, number of visits, and overall vote (the 1-5 scale). Those that had more votes with a higher vote number (3 votes total for an overall 5 score would be out 6 votes total for a 4.7 score), from my informal research, would go up on the front page 75% of the time. |