Kaitlin Kristina
20 years ago
Good idea- very economical. |
PnQ Mod Account
20 years ago
ummm... what is your feedback/suggestion? if you have none, this will be moved to "Other", if not deleted altogether as it really serves no purpose.... |
Luvmeluvr
20 years ago
Ann Marie....what is with you going lock happy? You seem to lock forums on a whim, just because you feel like it. Where in the forum rules does it say that the forums need to serve a purpose? Now, moving forums to where they belong, I can understand, but just locking them because YOU think they aren't worthy enough is kind of egotistical, don't you think? |
PnQ Mod Account
20 years ago
wow, which thread have I locked "on a whim"? |
Luvmeluvr
20 years ago
http://www.poems-and-quotes.com/discussion/topic.html?topic_id=13857 |
PnQ Mod Account
20 years ago
And they were not locked "on a whim" as you stated earlier... They were locked because of length. I edited my final post on them to clarify that... I'm sorry if it wasn't obvious to you. I know I stated in another thread (the one about that thread with 3000 and some posts not opening) that I would be locking threads when they got to the 400-500 range...Besides, Dainz and Janis can see what we do... if I was out of line, I'm sure I would be warned. |
Luvmeluvr
20 years ago
Hmmm...Bob, I think you are right. I take back what I said. These posts are NOT pointless. The point of them would be to make it to 700 posts or whatever. I was not aware that forums were to be deleted for length though, so do what needs to be done. And Janis and Dainz told the mods that they could delete a forum when it gets lengthy and useless...well using the word useless seems wrong, because if people are still posting in it, then it is obviously of some use to somebody. But I can understand the length thing, but perhaps that should be stated in the forum rules so that people understand that if they start a post to make it to 700 or 1000, it ain't gonna happen. |