Timeless Hopeful
18 years ago
Why? |
Steven Beesley
18 years ago
Votes do didily-squat, it is the critique that is useful. If you are concerned about numbers then go ahead and give your self 20,000. |
HOLLY ARMER
18 years ago
I always wondered how didily-squat was spelled :) |
Timeless Hopeful
18 years ago
Ha.... |
Timeless Hopeful
18 years ago
^^ |
Steven Beesley
18 years ago
Honest constructive critique [not the ignorant abusive ones that say nothing at all like *this poem s**ks*) on what the reader understands from the poem, the structure, flow, and diction is always valuable. |
The Wingless
18 years ago
And to that voting suggestion..I say no. |
juss an allycat
18 years ago
the voting system is not something 2b taken too seriously. however i dont believe it should be taken off, its a nice feature tho. ppl arent gona wana read ur poems if they have to vote everytime they read one. |
Steven Beesley
18 years ago
The voting system should not be taken seriously at all! |
Alex Marlatt
18 years ago
personally I don't mind the system of voting, except some person will just give me a bad vote, I don't mind if people do that as long as they tell my why they gave me that. That way I know where the deuce I'm going wrong in the poems and can rectify the mistakes. |
Italian Stallion
18 years ago
bump |