Timeless Hopeful
18 years ago
It is because the voting system in here sucks. |
Timeless Hopeful
18 years ago
Well thank you for your post. |
Jacklyn
18 years ago
i like how Bob spelt yourself. |
*BeAuTiFuLlY*iNaDeQuEtE*
18 years ago
ok, yes hun we no u have 314 comments, that doesnt mean we've herd of you, i sure haven't, believe it or not, you're not the only person on this site who rights good poems and there are only so many poems a gal can read. Any way if you think they're so great why do you care what other people think? |
Steven Beesley
18 years ago
Sorry Matthew, I've have never heard of you. As the others have said, this is a big site, there are so many poets. |
Timeless Hopeful
18 years ago
Lol...If you want to be know Matthew.Change your name. |
Riffy
18 years ago
I agree with Britt. Are you writing JUST to gain comments and praise from people? |
Timeless Hopeful
18 years ago
Wow... |
*BeAuTiFuLlY*iNaDeQuEtE*
18 years ago
sunny, couldn't of put it better myself |
Steven Beesley
18 years ago
Matthew, if anything this thread is begining to make |
TinyDancer46
18 years ago
Matthew... you got 314 comments. |
Cory Mastrandrea
18 years ago
From the sounds of things, you do have the recognition you are looking for. I mean you said it yourself you are "ranked 14th with a 4.7 on nearly 5000 votes after only 36 poems. [You] have the most commented on love poem on the site by far and a gold favorites award." That sounds pretty recognized to me. Shit you have 5000 votes. You know how many most poets on here have, between 20 and 100. You are recognized, and people do think you're good; you just don't see the recognition. Open your eyes man and notice that you are being recognized by the votes and good rating. Just because you're recognized doesn't mean your a favorite. Tupac was and still is recognized, but take the state of Montana and ask the population who there favorite music artist is, and I bet Tupac doesn't come close to making that list. You have to know what you have and don't worry about the rest. |
HOLLYWOODxBANGBANG
18 years ago
kay first of all, matthew is a fantastic writer! He writes not only for himself and the way that he feels, but he writes for the way that others feel as well. You guys have just started a big deal over nothing here. Who cares if you're a good writer? Who cares if you're a bad writer? |
-Ghostship Fidelity-
18 years ago
Hahaha, I think Matthew is the most vain person on here. Probably the largest ego as well. |
HOLLYWOODxBANGBANG
18 years ago
I also agree with Tony. Yeah i know that that is what he was going on about, he wanted to ask a question that he was wondering about, so that is what he did, isn't that what these forums are about? In my advice, Matthew doesn't need to worry about it, he is a good writer and he knows it, so do many others, but you guys also shouldn't have argued, it was pointless. |
Timeless Hopeful
18 years ago
I think Matthew got the message...Hugely so. |
Timeless Hopeful
18 years ago
I hope so...Bob... |
HansRik
18 years ago
Oh... it happens a bit too often, I am afraid. I am not a great poet or anything, but one of my (comparatively speaking) better works ("The Elegy of the Lovers") got downvoted withing five hours of it being recognised. |
Tara Kay
18 years ago
matthew. just to say this. there are more than 314 poets on this site, so obviously some of us havent heard of you, and there are probably more than one matthew here. |
BloodScars
18 years ago
lmfao i agree with ismail...his first post...cause on one of my best peoms...i got rated a 2 cause that basturd was jealous... |
HansRik
18 years ago
But that does not mean your poems that are rated 1s and 2s are better than anyone else's... |
HOLLYWOODxBANGBANG
18 years ago
"But you did get what you deserved Matthew. You asking to be recognised as a great poet, made people actually notice your rating." |