do u pefer rhyming or no rhyming

http://www.poems-and-quotes.com/discussion/topic.html?topic_id=51293

go there^

i like rhyming best because for one it sounds better (in my opinion, if it makes sence) but i like non rhyming if it tells a really good story not just bla bla bla!

a poem without rhymes is like a unicorn without a horn....

Rhyming is a great way to show you have talent and yet still are able to get your point across. Not many poets who do not rhyme appeal to me for anyone can just put words down on a page (even if not very well) and say it's poetry. It takes a real poet to make the emotion flow through the poem, so it really depends.

Besides all that, rhyming flows easier.

xDarkSuicidex

i think it depends on the person. i like rhyming sometimes and other times i dont. i mean sometimes its easier not to rhym words and others it is

It all depends for me, because some poems who don't rhyme the poems arn't very good but others without rhyming it's just like WOW, because of all the emotion flowed out. I like rhyming though because it's a step higher from not rhyming. Personally I think you have to put more thought into rhyming but that may just be me.

I personally like writing poems which rhyme more than ones that don't rhyme. I don't mind reading non rhyming ones, but when I write a poem, it just doesn't sound right to me if it isn't rhyming. =/ Strange, but yeah.

i prefer rhyming as it helps my poems to flow. x

i think dark suicide is right!!

I think rhyming or at least having a good flow to your poem is essential. If you're a good enough poet to have your poem flow without rhymes, then more power to you, but it's very difficult to create a good poem that doesn't rhyme. Although just because it rhymes doesnt make it a good poem. Bottom line, whatever works best. :-)

john Milton on rhyme (in some information about the verse of Paradise lost):

Rhyme being no necessary adjunct or true ornament of poem or good verse
in longer works especially,
but the invention of a barbarous age,to set of wretched matter and lame meeter(...)to express many things otherwise and for the most part worse then else they would have expressed them.
not without cause,therefore,some both Italian and spanish poets of prime note have rejected rhyme both in longer and shorter works ,as have also,long since our best English tragedies,as a thing of itself,to all judicious eares,triveal and of no true musical delight;which consists only in apt numbers,fit quantity of syllables,and the sense of vaiously drawn out from one verse into another,not in the jingling sounds of like endings.

personally i like rhyme, but i do like this view to it
a good rhyme is sometimes very nice to read, but it's often so forced

i think it depends on the poem and the poets ability to use rhyme