Noir
17 years ago
I may be digressing a bit, but I believe that there will always be scapegoats....To the advancement of society and science. Before it was humans (Ethnic Minorities), today it is the animals.....Tommorrow it will be the inhabititants of various other planets.... |
Kevin
17 years ago
It's tricky to really say what you mean in a text only discussion, particularly in a charge debate like this one. However, I think we should buck the trend of this website and not call for this tppic to be closed down simply because we are getting all hot and bothered about it. Maybe we are close to some kind of conclusioon, or comprimise or something!..now is not the time to stop! |
silvershoes
17 years ago
"Bang Bang and Daenyers tried to say that, until you eloquently shut them down in a condesending manner" |
Noir
17 years ago
It's tricky to really say what you mean in a text only discussion, particularly in a charge debate like this one. However, I think we should buck the trend of this website and not call for this tppic to be closed down simply because we are getting all hot and bothered about it. Maybe we are close to some kind of conclusioon, or comprimise or something!..now is not the time to stop!" |
Noir
17 years ago
Noir, I'm glad I made you laugh, you returned the favour mate, seriously. If you think the meat industry is a pain free holiday for all the hundreds of thousands of animals that are slaughtered for it's needs, daily, then go here and watch some of the films...it's not pleasant viewing, but you might learn something, I know I did." |
silvershoes
17 years ago
And I believe the topic is animal testing, not animal eating. |
Noir
17 years ago
Kevin: I do not understand your logic...It seems really reasonable to me, that hurting an animal that can feel pain, is morally wrong. |
Jaime
17 years ago
Apparently, there are alternatives to animal testing that many scientists agree would be more effective. One of the biggest is that now we can clone human tissue. Would that not be way more effective to test on, considering it came from a human and not an animal who is built differently than us? |
silvershoes
17 years ago
Once we can impeach Bush, that idea will mean something. |
Vanessa
17 years ago
I am against animal testing unless it is something important. I don't believe an animal should be tested , or put though experments to see how intellegent it is. Tell me how can something be intellegent, if they kill it. Diesect it to see what makes it tick. I don't believe people should mess with something, that they know nothing about. It is in my opion it is a crime against nature. |
Jordan
17 years ago
Depends on whether or not the product is for animals. |
Kevin
17 years ago
If you have the inclination, here is a very simple timeline of the medical breakthroughs and advancements that have been made possible, and safe using animal testing. |
Kevin
17 years ago
Animals prey on each other for survival, that is a law of nature and we all accept it. |
TracyM
17 years ago
Ok, i used to be completely against animal testing. |
The Pessimistic Peabody
17 years ago
I think its wrong generally. especially cuz we are testing stuff on them they will never use. humans should test human products. now flea products and stuff is fine so long as they aint tortured. testing them the way we do now is saying they aint worth love and they don't matter and are less than use. god told adam to name the animals, not test medicine on them.... |
Cantchangeme
17 years ago
Cosmetics - No |
claire
17 years ago
I definitely think big stuff (like cancer n heart n diabetes meds) should be tested on animals, just in the most humane way possible. anything that causes an animal unneccessary harm is cruel, but it is better to take an animal's life than a childs, or a someone's mothers, or someone's lover - you get the idea. |
claire
17 years ago
Just so u no, if the chickens spend 5 min. a day outside with enough space 2 turn around, they can call themselves free range. Sometimes they r just let out onto concrete, not even grass or dirt. i always buy amish, cuz they tend 2 be honest ppl who actually believe in what they say |
silvershoes
17 years ago
But then would you rather a monkey that you had raised since birth and bonded a deep friendship with...die or a random stranger? I guess if you aren't that fond of monkeys, that question may not seem difficult to answer. If someone had me choose between my horse and a random stranger, there would be one less human polluting this planet. |
Richard Machado
17 years ago
...*chimming in* |
silvershoes
17 years ago
How do you know the chemicals are toxic until they have been tested? Way to go mojo. Either way, before you think your ego has been smashed, let me state that a LOT of animal testing is done for "meaningful" scientific purposes outside cosmetic production. I'm surprised you don't know this. |
Richard Machado
17 years ago
You don't have to test on animals, you can test chemicals on human tissue, and blood samples. |