ChildofGod87
20 years ago
...ummmm...never heard about it...lol:) |
miss scooby
20 years ago
well i agree with Bob on this one i am TOTALLY against capital punishment and my reasons for it is because every since i can remember society has always taught that violence is something they do not tolerate in their community (Medaphorically speaking) and when violence is potrayed they retailate in the same way by killing another person because of that crime. Dont get my wrong crime is something that is poluted in this world but also over rated. yes i know someone is going to bring up the the bible about a tooth for a tooth and eaye for an eye and all that which is fine, and i accept that but i dont think it proves the slightest point, what to fear our government because they have the power to get rid of a problem? i would make that person who committed a crime rot in prison and let them live everyday of knowing what they did, because there soul will die rather then them physically...but thats just my oppinion i always get into debates about this with my brothers... |
.x.PorteR.x.
20 years ago
As with Scooby and Bob, i am completely against capital punishment. It is like the seed in somebody's eye and the plank in your own. Administering the capital punishment to somebody is hypocritical - a life for a life isn't right. |
!*!Zoe!*!
20 years ago
You guys all have really good opinions. I'm eally not sure about this one becausehaving the person rot in prison knowing what they did ius great and all, but your taxes are going to that. To keep prisoners alive. |
miss scooby
20 years ago
Hey zoe; |
Johnny Marlin 2
20 years ago
Well, It seems pretty unanimous, one problem... I think the death penalty is a good thing... Well, lethal injection anyway. But, I do think there should be more restrictions on it. People that have multiple witnesses proving they commited the crime. Otherwise, let them rot. |
Liam
20 years ago
depends on the offence and the amount of true evidence. but i think they should be made to work, and put back into society what theyve taken out. fund there stay in prison. we could do with more of this in the UK. Ecspecially for the amount of paedophiles and murderers we seem to be getting lately. |
Liam
20 years ago
this probably sounds really wrong and ure all gonna disagree, but why would the executioner blame it on them selves? id sleep at nite if that was my choice in job. its like saying how would the police man sleep that arrested them, how could the judge sleep that found them guilty? Why would they blame it on them selves? Bad comarasent but the nazis killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people, would u go around germany blaming every war veteran from there? or every german? |
Ã맆îñ¥
20 years ago
I can't say i hink it is fair. I mean if you are wrongly convicted well its kinda tough isn't it. There is no opurtunity to speak out for yourself. This is of course greatly influenced by the fact that i have grown up in England where this is illegal. |
Natalie84
20 years ago
I am totally against it...if you kill someone who murdered another you are NO better than him/her. You did exactly what he did. I honestly think that a life in a little cell is punishment enough. I know a guy I was friends with when I was younger, he was sent to prison for attempted murder, got 13 years, and swears as soon as he gets out he will do something to go right back. People like that who don't have any remorse what so ever need to be locked up for ever. He doesn't care about the poor little old man that he damn near killed. Eventually though he will get sick of the life he's now stuck with, he will wish that he could turn back the hands of time, I truely believe this. And being that unless you have HARD evidence you can't be sure that every murderer actually is the criminal. So how could you kill someone if you weren't ABSOLUTELY sure. I agree with who ever said they would not be able to live with themselves if they killed a man who was innocent. I couldn't ... truthfully I wouldn't be able to live with my self if I took any part at all, whether it be jury, judge, lawyer or actually killing them, even if I was 100% sure they murdered someone. Murder is a sin that you will not walk through the pearly white gates with. |
Johnny Marlin 2
20 years ago
I do agree with Bob Shank. there have definately been incidents where people have been wrongly accused... That is the reason why I say that I think you should only be executed if there are multiple witnesses, or strong evidence against the person. The problem is nowadays jails are getting to be a retreat. Sometimes I wish I were in jail. They are getting more and more freedom everyday. They have cable T.V., they are allowed magazine subscriptions, recently a lawsuit came up about the quality of food they recieve. By the time you know it they are gonna have waterbeds, steak dinners, and room service... ok, maybe I'm exagerating, but I think you get my point... |
Liam
20 years ago
yeah, im for it. aslong as there is true evidence. too many people kill, and get sent to prison (for life apperntly) and get released on good behaviour about 14 yrs after. good behaviour? these people dont learn there lesson, once a killer always a killer. why murder sum1? that instinct is never gonna go away. why relaese these people back to society? why drian public funds letting them enjoy life inside prison |
Timothy r
20 years ago
I am all for it..rest in hell, Scott Peterson |
Johnny Marlin 2
20 years ago
Sorry Timothy r, but maybe that is the way all executions should be handled, I don't know how you feel bob, but what if they held everyone for ten years. the only problem I could see is jail overcrowding issues, but by that time if someone was wrongly accused, it would probably be known. That way they can rot, and then get executed, the best of both worlds. |
Jacki
20 years ago
I'm still not sure on this......Why I think it would be a worse punishment for them to sit and think why they are sitting in prision each and every day of there lives. On the other hand I would really like to see my father fry a gruesome horrible death, and watch him die. Hes a child molester and he goes to jail, then gets out, does it again and goes back to jail. Hes in jail right now. And I dont beilve the "justice system" is working for him. People like that I think need to die. And its up the family members if they want to see it, but I don't think the public should be able to see it. |
~*^*~ longing to belong ~*^*~
20 years ago
NO i really don't think public executions should be allowed. It's just another type of porn. |
in the realm of Chaos
20 years ago
public execution is sadistic |
Johnny Marlin 2
20 years ago
Who would really want to watch a person die? I don't care how much revenge I wanted, I couldn't watch. Especially not cheer, and rejoice over his death. That's just wrong. Although I agree some people just need to die, I don't think it is appropriate to watch. |
~*^*~ longing to belong ~*^*~
20 years ago
makes sence and I agree with you, but some people would say that jails and tyhings ike that would become overcrouded. |
Kevin
20 years ago
Totally against. It's a sign of the weakness of our society, our inability to deal with those who have strayed from the path most of us agree to walk on. |