Objection overruled

I make a motion, if u agree with it u only say i second, if u disagree, u say objection, now when u object u have to give a very good reason why you are objecting cos your objection is setting a new motion which everbody has to second till some one screams objection overruled with a really good reason
***************************************

motion: guys r better lovers than girls

OBJECT. GUY COULDN'T SURVIVE WITHOUT US GIRLS. THEY'D MISS OUR GOODIES! LOL.

motion: girls have the better friends.

Objection overruled, the goodies is not what makes the love

Hey guys and i second

^^thank you

Motion : guys have periods too. Hee Hee and PMS

Objection: that does not make sense whatever you mean by periods and PMS

I'll second that Melinda. lol.

Objection!!!!!!!!! Guys do not know how to love. Girls are the emotional one`s, the one`s who just want to cuddle, and if you notice most of the time in a relationship it`s ALMOST always the girl who does the romantic/sweet stuff!

Wait...not completely true, but in most cases.

And I second, Melinda, guy`s do have period`s hehe. They have period`s where they just do really stupid stuff. I think it mean`s all of there retardedness if coming out. Hehe. That made no sence..did I spell that right?? :))

Objection overruled for amber ; why? cos she defeats the merits of her own arguments with the phrase 'wait...not completely true...' and 'that made no sense...did i spell that right'???......lol

so the motion still stands; guys r better lovers than girls...heeeeya

Mostly is not good enough...i need a strong objection

motion: guys r better lovers than girls

I don't think that's a fair motion because it depends on the the guy and girl in question and their personalites. It also depends on your idea of love, since everyone's is different, it's an impossible statement to refute or uphold.

Objection on the grounds that you can't possibly defend or uphold a statement like that. Also, you didn't give a reason why you think that is true.

^_^ lol

.:Danielle:.

I object about guys being better lovers. do you ever hear a girl say you're the love of my life. then the next week "you'll do it if you love me"

sure guys loves us, but they also bvoss us around. we do all these things for you and guys don't even notice.

Motion: Guys are clueless to the obvious.

^ You hear that if the girl is a gold digger. And girls boss guys around too.

I do however second the motion that we are clueless sometimes. :)

Well to tell you the truth I don`t give a crap about what you say.

New motion. um... love is about the other's needs not your wants.

i made this quote.

I agree with you about that one. But wait, I forgot my opinion doesn`t count.

^^yes it does!

Cos this retard
"Objection overruled for amber ; why? cos she defeats the merits of her own arguments with the phrase 'wait...not completely true...' and 'that made no sense...did i spell that right'???......lol"

What a jerk. Ughh

I second!!!!! or third....idk!

Oooops did amber say am a retard and a jerk, that is pretty unfair...i only overruled her objection on the ground of the weakness of her arguments and she takes such huge flesh off my face...that hurts

You still haven't given us your reason that -you- think that guys are better lovers than girls Michalord.

.:Danielle:.

In what sense?? love making... or the depth of the love... if so neither... because some guys suck in the sack... while others are great... some girls suck in the sack.. not literally... while others...ahem... are great... and the sex/gender does not matter... love is love... so the statement "Guys are better lovers than girls" lets leave that to the middle schoolers...

^ You make a very good point

.:Danielle:.

So bianca's comments are actually an objection...that is the essence of the whole fun...that a motion is proposed and then the madness in it is pointed out...which then leads to a new motion

Why dont u give us a reason that it's true!!
if u cant convince me...
OBJECTION!

Only women have the ability to sympathize and empathize... because they are the nurturers of life... men are like toddlers with millions of dollars in their pockets... sure they hold life... (in their sack) but they do not know the worth of a life... my argument... " a man can not love as strongly, as greatly, as unique, as a woman"

*Do I believe it?? who cares... can you prove it wrong??

^ u go girl!

I will second the motion that gentleman are better lovers than ladies just for the sake of restarting this argument and putting in some fresh ideas.

1. Ladies are complicated, but when a gentleman is in love with a lady, he never stops trying to figure her out and know more about her, yet still respecting her privacy and rights of space.

2. While gentlemen know that in a loving relationship that the lady does not require any gifts or perks, he will still window shop and look for something that makes him automatically think of her and then will proceed to purchasing said unit item.

3. A true gentleman still knows what chivalry is and utilizes that code of ethics to treat a lady with respect.

4. A gentleman never complains about driving on dates, but he also never argues if the lady wishes to drive.

5. A gentleman tries to express his feelings to a lady. He may not always know the right way to express them, but he still tries and responds to all of the lady's questions of clarification.

The above list is just a small portion, but it should be enough to get both ladies and gents up in arms over it.

To be honest.. to be frank... factual yet it proves nothing.. it merely states that a man does what is expected of him.. and ofcourse they feel they need the world of compliments after doing what they are supposed to do.....it does not prove that men are better lovers... an equivilent at best... better hmmm...

On the contrary cause a gentleman never seeks out a compliment, but when one is given he graciously accepts it and moves on. The only issue is that in today's society and world there has been an exponential decrease in the number of ladies and gentleman in comparison to "bitches, hoes, bastards, and pricks"

Who created these names??? man... women surely didn't... bitches and hoes... there was a time where a bitch was a female dog.. but man in his arrogance saw need in referring to women as animals... and men can't open a door without wanting to be congratulated as a child

Society created those names, and yes if you review history, society is controlled by man whether you like it or not. And men can open doors and not need to be congratulated, but then again, how many women actually give a simple thank you?

Well if he is a gentleman... he shouldn't expect one because it should come natural to be protector of woman...i heard this quote a while ago, don't know who its by but it goes "the weaker sex is the stronger sex because of the stronger sex weakness for the weaker sex" so in essence we are in control.. complete and utter control... but we are swaying from the original argument... case in point "girls rule boys drool" if we are going to grade school mentality and frame of mind... with comments such as "boys are better lovers"

Ooops...*looks up* the fun turned to some really heated talk....nice piece of work here...so what did i miss...what is the latest motion, who is objecting, and who is overrulling the objection...this is a fun court not ...........

Lol!

My motion:

Certain people are better lovers than others, not depending on race, sex or anything like that, but because they are who they are.

.:Danielle:.

Now there is no way i won't second that...go girl : I SECOND....well wanted to make sure u see it

No...no...upon second thought...well i thought more than second though...but i object...yes i object because i was wondering 'who are certain people'? if u can clarify certain ppl...hey am here...i will just come back and re-instate a second for the motion....*sol*

Certain people just meaning that some people are better lovers than others, know what I mean??

.:Danielle:.