IdTakeABulletForYou
17 years ago
Is it possible to write a classic anymore? I mean, the newest REAL classic is from like, 30, 40 years ago... I mean, does it become a classic after a long time or what? |
Kevin
17 years ago
You must assume that the classics of 40 years in the future are the big compitition winners of today, seeing as those are the poems and poets who get the most notice. |
littlemissxsunshine
17 years ago
I think i knoe where your getting. |
Cory Mastrandrea
17 years ago
I hate to agree with Kevin that right now what sells is abstract formless crap. People like experimentalism, structure, and form over function and didacticism. Bring back didactic poets. Also, time is a major component of "classics." However, no body gets deemed classic within 40 years. they may be cannonized, but that is a far cry from classic. Literary critic ben johnson said it depends on time, mainly because if he expects that if it isn't universal or if it is just pleasure reading that it will fade from memory while those books that pertain to moral, political, social, human issues will remain in thought and will continued to be studied. This is one reason that the nobel prize for literature doesn't usually go to a younger author, but is given to an older one who has a collection of works--to see how they stand out in time. |
IdTakeABulletForYou
17 years ago
Perfect response. Thanks for the feedback! |
Ashleigh Skye
17 years ago
I definatly agree with cory you cant tell if what you write is going to be a classic or not you have to just write and see if it stands the test of time. |